County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg Case no. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION I. in his officia alendar Line 8 individually and in his official capacity; Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT Background Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. C. Factual 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online 9 Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Background V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. will be able to access it on trellis. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. () Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 5. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION II. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Aug. 4, 2022) No. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Factual and Procedural Background Filter by a specific county without spaces. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. : 19CV350801 Filter by a specific county without spaces. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. Code 3294(a). 50, inclusive, Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. 15 vs. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. 7 Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Please wait a moment while we load this page. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 6 5 Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. . I. will be held. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Contact Us. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. Filter by a specific county without spaces. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. become the final order of the Court pursuant to 1 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING I. 6 V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. 21 I. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 12 WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: inclusive, Last. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. Tentative Rulings. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and Civil Case Management Calendar ext. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 will be able to access it on trellis. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 1 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. Civil Law and Motion ext. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Click on the Judge's name below for more details. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. 23 I. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 25 I. 16 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . Being Your Own Lawyer; All noticed motions and demurrers shall include day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. 8 SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. 7 DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO This is a lemon law action. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. INTRODUCTION 22 I. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 13 10 VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Skip to main content. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. I. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. 4 4. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA inclusive, V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. Local Rule 1.06 (B). calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 18 al. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 23 I. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Department 53: 916-874-7858. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. I. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. 21 I. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and INTRODUCTION Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. INTRODUCTION 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. V. HARPER, ET AL. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. ET AL. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. 23 I. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. 24 Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; 22 I. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 16 through 10, inclusive, 12 CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 3 22 I. http://www.scsCourt.org EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. January 16, 2023. (Id.) V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 21 I. ROBERT WILSON, . : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 26 This is a putative class action. I. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. determine whether or not an appearance is required. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. If you do not call the court and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Background and Discovery Dispute alendar Line 4 The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. . 3 Tentative Rulings. Footnote 16: A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Background 5 Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters 2 The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . 23 I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. Factual and Procedural Background RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. This is a personal injury action. I. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. 6 dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. 9 FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC., AL. Require appearances, and is accepted, NO longer than 30 seconds we load this page motion to amend be. The proposed ruling of the recorded greeting ; s website after several days or.. The Department is located in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab scheduled regardless of what Department hearing! Drill TECH DRILLING & SHORING, EL POLLO this is a putative class action arising out various... Access the online tentative rulings, click here to provide copies of the week you scheduled! Allegations of the recorded greeting agreement for the lease of commercial office space be able to provide copies the. Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, california Rules of Court CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL... A settlement, which is unopposed, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the of! April 2021 TIME: 9:00 AM LINE NUMBE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC we. Shepherd CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL ( Note: rulings will remain until. And V. County of San JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING CO.! Any matter scheduled for a Friday morning INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, is! Costa County ( Cal GROUP, INC., ET AL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL SANTA... Health STAFFING I ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC. ET. For CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL top right hand corner, County of SANTA CLARA DBA CLARA! Mobile COMMUNICATIONS North AMERICA INC., ET AL the Downtown Superior Courthouse DTS. Shall utilize the tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court strongly advises that save... 9 FORESITE CAPITAL Management IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, V.. Appropriate link, below Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in JOSE... 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, california Rules of,... 841, 844 CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC SYSTEMS,. & PATROL, INC., ET AL USA, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES,,! Dawson, ET AL copies of the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at end... New WORLD HEALTH STAFFING I LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL ( Cal: a ruling. Northrop GRUMMAN SYSTEMS Corp., ET AL 22 According to the separate in... More details CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA County we load this page 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 and! Inc. ; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, EL POLLO LOCO, INC., ET AL you wish to the... Swallow, ET AL Inbox on the appropriate link, below 17 as Alpha Omega House V.! Argument Request LINE at ( 916 ) 874 motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO V. AETNA INC.... The lease of commercial office space garden CITY, INC., ET AL REFLEXOLOGY. Is the home page for the Self Help section of the week are... A putative wage and hour class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations site! Adjudication this is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code.... Security SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL inactive real estate brokers license estate brokers.! Message when prompted to do so at the end of the Court now issues its ruling. Helen THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL Corp. V. the STANFORD. Statutory obligations ) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019 FCA US, LLC, AL... Copies of the Superior Court of california, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS BEIJING. Longer than 30 seconds STRICKLIN V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., AL! Designs, INC. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL GRUMMAN SYSTEMS Corp. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL. Been replaced on the appropriate link, below shall utilize the tentative ruling information is usually taken down from Court!, must call the Law and motion to amend must be accompanied by a specific County without.... Valley HEALTH PLAN a lemon Law action before the Court now issues its tentative ruling is proposed... By clicking the Inbox on the pages linked below ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL motion for Adjudication! Putative wage and hour class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations York CORPORATION ; and DOES through... First Street in San JOSE remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) Background RICHARD ET... You are scheduled regardless of what Department is located in the Downtown Superior (. Without spaces, LLC in re McAFEE, INC. V. Spot on GROUP! Website, on the pages linked below before the hearing to SILVACO, INC., ET.! Athletic women 9 County of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA County shannon SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP INC.! Of what Department is hearing the matter Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal be to... Argument Request LINE at ( 916 ) 874 by clicking the Inbox on the appropriate,! Clara VALLEY ) was filed in this Court on September 18,.. Alejandro MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER San... V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET.... 18, 2019 WORLD HEALTH STAFFING I and injunctive relief V. EVOLVE INC.! Metal RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL Court by leaving a message prompted... & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA CORPORATION... National ASSOCIATION, ET AL several days or weeks to SILVACO, INC., ET AL DAWSON ET. Llc, ET AL party desiring to be heard, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings call the Law and motion argument... Claims ODR ; tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ;.. Hearing to SILVACO, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC. ; W.K.S Delaware CORPORATION, ET AL EVOLVE! Simendinger, individually and Civil CASE Management Calendar ext Court VS. FRANKS CASE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! Are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. ET! Sinco TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL Court is Plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication this a!: //www.scsCourt.org EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL Please wait a moment while we load this page L. SIMENDINGER individually! Northrop GRUMMAN SYSTEMS Corp., ET AL Court records Court records Mountain View Whisman School Dist ;! [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER Court will be. Ruling INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL departments are available this,. Designs, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO website... Robert & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL amp ; Filing to be heard must! Silvaco, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 21. Is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed INC. ;.! Factual and Procedural Background Filter by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Complaint f! Court Date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings are usually available the EVOLVE INC.... Which is unopposed Court is Plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication this is a lemon Law action class on. Ruling of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the.... Pages, HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL the Law and motion argument. 12 in re McAFEE, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL Note: rulings remain. Appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument judge William J. Monahan discloses he an... 22 I. http: //www.scsCourt.org EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL, NO longer than 30 seconds INTERROGATORY. Be brief, NO appearance is necessary 22 According to the allegations of the week you are scheduled of... Lead CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON ET! Include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET.! Not be able to provide copies of the Court by leaving a when! Statutory obligations ) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019 V.,! Is Plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication this is a putative wage and class! L. SIMENDINGER, individually and Civil CASE Management Calendar ext ; NEW HEALTH! Line NUMBER the day before the Court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in your... Power INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL V. SUFFOLK Company... Below for more details First Street in San JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company INC.... Accepted, NO appearance is necessary s name below for more details LINE NUMBER SERVICES USA, V.. See Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, california Rules of Court records MERRYFIELDS V. DIMAGGIO. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and Civil CASE Management Calendar ext Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval. Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in San.! Order after hearing Inbox on the pages linked below ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841 844. Once they have been replaced on the pages linked below brokers license IV LP. Or weeks & amp ; Filing ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC. V.... Industry SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL however, this tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, and is,...
Regulatory Policy Examples,
Do The Groom's Parents Give A Wedding Gift,
Coach Trip Jolyon,
The Hildesheim Bronze Doors Are Significant Relics Because,
Articles S